Legal Opinion

State v. Moen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 2003No. 72435-1PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

This case involves the Spokane County Prosecutor’s informal policy of refusing to plea bargain with a criminal defendant who has successfully compelled disclosure of a confidential informant’s identity in a civil forfeiture proceeding. Prior to trial, Peter H. Moen moved for dismissal under CrR 8.3(b), claiming the State’s policy of refusing to plea bargain violated his right to due process because it chilled his right to discovery in a civil case. The trial court denied the motion and the Court of Appeals affirmed. We hold that the trial court properly refused to dismiss this prosecution and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. KorumWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. KorumWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. MoenWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Porter v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API