Legal Opinion
State v. Moen
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 11, 2003No. 72435-1PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
76 P.3d 721 (2003)
150 Wash.2d 221
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Peter H. MOEN, Petitioner.
No. 72435-1.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
September 11, 2003.
Paul Beymer Mack, Spokane, for Petitioner.
Steven Tucker, Spokane County Prosecutor, Kevin Korsmo, Deputy, Andrew Metts, Deputy, for Respondent.
MADSEN, J.
This case involves the Spokane County Prosecutor's informal policy of refusing to plea bargain with a criminal defendant who has successfully compelled disclosure of a confidential informant's identity in a civil forfeiture proceeding. Prior to trial, Peter Moen moved for dismissal…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. KorumWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. KorumWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Porter v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.