State v. Moen
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentSanders, J.
(dissenting) — Although the prosecutor had no obligation to plea bargain with defendant Moen, he was obliged to refrain from conduct which would deprive Moen of his life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Pursuant to MacDonald v. Musick, 425 F.2d 373 (9th Cir. 1970), I conclude Moen’s due process rights were violated, and dismissal of the criminal proceeding is mandated, where the prosecution penalizes the defendant for seeking legitimate discovery in a collateral civil forfeiture proceeding.
MacDonald, like Moen, was subject to a criminal prosecution: MacDonald for driving…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hugh Wendell MacDonald v. James A. MusickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- State v. MoenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. MoenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002