Legal Opinion

Midwest Mfg. Co. v. Filter Corp.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided July 31, 1935No. 771PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIPPEY, District Judge.

This is an action for an infringement of United States letters patent No. 1,521,575, issued December 30, 1924. The action was commenced on September 19, 1931. Answer was filed January 30, 1932. On May 11, 1934, a motion was made by plaintiff *707for leave to file a voluntary bill of particulars. This motion was denied in part and granted in part by order signed July 3, 1934. On November 2, 1934, upon application of plaintiff, plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended bill of complaint, which was filed on November 3, 1934. On May 13, 1935, an order was made, upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. A. B. Dick Co. v. Underwood Typewriter Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1916
  2. Penniman v. Fuller & Warren Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Flower v. MacGinnissCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
  4. Hespe v. Corning Glass Works, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1935
  5. Kling v. HaringDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. National Nut Co. of California v. Kelling Nut Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1945
  2. Sure-Fit Products Co. v. Med-Vogue Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Midwest Mfg. Co. v. Staynew Filter Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1935
  4. Axel C. Wickman and Wickman, Ltd. v. Vinco Corporation and Joseph J. OsplackCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  5. J. D. Ferry Co. v. Macbeth Engineering Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API