Legal Opinion

New York Life Insurance v. Palmer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 28, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for judgment declaring that coverage of the defendant’s spouse under a group health insurance policy was properly rescinded, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered May 5, 1989, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant, in his application for health insurance under a group policy issued to his employer, falsely answered specific questions about his wife on a health statement which was an integral part of the application. He failed to disclose…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Kulikowski v. Roslyn Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Amalgamated Mutual Casualty Co. v. SchultzNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Guzman v. American Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Erwin DeMarino Trucking Co. v. JacksonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  2. Claim of Cruz v. New Millennium Construction & Restoration Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Falcon Crest Diamonds, Inc. v. DixonNew York Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Douglas v. PROTECTIVE LIFE AND ANNUITY INS. CO.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API