Legal Opinion
Falcon Crest Diamonds, Inc. v. Dixon
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 21, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Walter M. Schackman, J.
Defendant Andrew Warwick Dixon, representative underwriter on behalf of all interested underwriters at Lloyds subscribing to policy of insurance No. SCB200578/92 (the Underwriters), moves for an order of summary judgment to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that the insurance policy was voided, ab initio, when plaintiff made material misrepresentations in its application or proposal for insurance pursuant to Insurance Law § 3105 (a). Dixon also maintains that plaintiff breached the contract of insurance by failing to comply *452with policy conditions…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Albert J. Schiff Associates, Inc. v. FlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Geer v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Wechsler v. PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Leamy v. Berkshire Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re September 11th Liability Insurance Coverage CasesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Intelligent Digital Systems, LLC v. Beazley InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Kurt Wayne, Inc. v. Lead Underwriters at Lloyds LondonNew York Supreme Court · 2006