State v. Bechtel
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtQuillin, J.
This is an appeal from defendant-appellant’s conviction for speeding. The trial court took judicial notice of the accuracy and reliability of the model K-55 moving radar unit. We affirm.
Richard Lucas, a trooper with the Ohio State Patrol, clocked the defendant at sixty-seven miles per hour in a fifty-five mile per hour zone. The defendant acknowledged going sixty-three miles per hour, but denied going sixty-seven. Lucas testified as to the readings on his radar unit, his calibration of the radar unit and his qualifications for using the unit. Lucas testified over the defendant’s objection…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. WalkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- State v. KramerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- United States v. TraficantDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1983
- State v. AhernSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- State v. ReaddingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. TailoHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. Gellenbeck, Ca2008-08-030 (4-13-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- City of Cincinnati v. McDaniel, C-070034 (2-22-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. AyeshOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.