Legal Opinion

United States v. Traficant

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided June 1, 1983No. Crim. A. CR82-148YPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is the government’s Motion in Limine requesting this Court to prohibit the introduction at trial of any evidence regarding psychological stress evaluation tests. Upon consideration, the motion is granted.

The psychological stress evaluation test results at issue in this case are the product of a voice stress analysis done by defendant Traficant’s chosen examiner. Traficant opposes the government’s motion and seeks to introduce the results of these tests at trial.

Voice stress analysis (VSA) is a method of lie detection.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. United States v. Herman Franks, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Max Britton, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Boyce MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Orville E. Stifel, IICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BressonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. DrakeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. Sabag v. Continental South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Barrel of Fun, Inc. D/B/A the Music Factory v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. State v. BechtelOhio Court of Appeals · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API