Legal Opinion

State v. Tailo

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1989No. 13540PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, C.J.

Defendant-Appellant Peni Tailo, Jr. (Appellant) appeals from his conviction for driving a motor vehicle in excess of the legal speed limit in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 291C-102. The State’s evidence consisted of the testimony of a single police officer who relied upon a reading from a K-15 radar speed detection device (K-15 gun) which clocked the speed of Appellant’s vehicle at seventy miles per hour in a fifty-five mile per hour zone. The issue on appeal is whether the State must prove the accuracy of a tuning fork used in verifying the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. TomanelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  2. State v. SpenceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  3. City of St. Louis v. BoeckerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. State v. GerdesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  5. State v. PrimmCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. AssayeHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. StoaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. State v. Eid.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. LoHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Myatt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API