Legal Opinion

Bieber v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 19, 1993No. 92SC220PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey

Defendant Donald W. Bieber appeals his convictions for first-degree murder, aggravated robbery and second-degree aggravated motor vehicle theft on the grounds that the trial court erred in denying his request for a jury instruction on the defense of settled insanity. The three-member panel of the court of appeals issued three sepa*813rate opinions in the case — one dispositive, one concurring and one dissenting — revolving around the question of whether settled insanity is a tenable defense under our statutory scheme and case law. People v. Bieber, 835 P.2d 542 (Colo.App.1992). We granted…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Hendershott v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. People v. DelGuidiceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  4. People v. LowSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. People v. Lim Dum DongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Salazar v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. People v. GrantColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. People v. VothSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  4. State v. SextonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  5. Morgan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API