People v. Voth
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
¶ 1 In this original C.A.R. 21 proceeding, we review the trial court's oral order allowing the Defendant, Paul Voth, to assert involuntary intoxication as an affirmative defense under section 18-1-804, C.R.S. (2018). We issued a rule to show cause why the trial court's order should not be vacated. We now hold that the trial court abused its discretion when it found that a virus qualifies as a "substance" that can result in intoxication under section 18-1-804. The trial court therefore also abused its discretion in finding that Voth was entitled to assert involuntary intoxication because this…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Frazier v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- People v. RathSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- M.S. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- People v. GarciaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Roup v. Commercial Research, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
- Nowak v. SuthersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
- Beren v. BerenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
- Carmen NIETO v. CLARK'S MARKET, INC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- City & Cty. of Denver v. Dennis ex. rel. HeyboerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.