Legal Opinion
Trustees of Amalgamated Insurance Fund v. Saltz
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 1, 1991No. 90 Civ. 0771 (RWS)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, the Trustees of the Amalgamated Insurance Fund (“the Fund”), have moved for summary judgment on their claim for ERISA pension plan withdrawal liability against the defendants Nathan and Jack Saltz (“the Saltzes”). For the following reasons, the motion is granted.
The Parties
The Fund is a trust fund designed to provide health, welfare and retirement benefits to eligible employees of businesses in contractual relations with the Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union (“the Union”) and its affiliates. The Fund actually consists of two distinct…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ilgwu National Retirement Fund, Sol C. Chaikin and Joseph Moore v. Levy Bros. Frocks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- United Food and Commercial Workers Union v. Progressive SupermarketsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. Center City Motors, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1984
- ILGWU National Retirement Fund v. B.B. Liquidating Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
3Cited by17 opinions
- Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, a Pension Trust, Loran W. Robbins, Marion M. Winstead v. Jean Ditello and Angelo DitelloCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Amalgamated Lithographers of America v. Unz & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Vaughn v. SextonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Vaughn v. SextonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Ceco Concrete Construction, LLC v. Centennial State Carpenters Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.