Legal Opinion

ILGWU National Retirement Fund v. B.B. Liquidating Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 16, 1991No. 89 Civ. 2005 (RWS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiffs ILGWU National Retirement Fund and two of its trustees (“the Fund”) have moved to file an amended complaint and for summary judgment on the complaint as amended. Defendant B.B. Liquidating Corp. (“BBLC”) has cross-moved for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the motion to amend the complaint is granted and both motions for summary judgment are denied.

THE PARTIES

The Fund is a New York trust which provides pension benefits to approximately 130,000 workers in the garment industry. It is a “pension plan” and a “multiemployer plan” as those terms…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. John C. Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, John R. Colli, Jr., Russell C. Gabrielson, and John R. Colli, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  4. Knight v. U.S. Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  5. Ilgwu National Retirement Fund, Sol C. Chaikin and Joseph Moore v. Levy Bros. Frocks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trustees of Amalgamated Insurance Fund v. SaltzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API