Legal Opinion

Martin v. Shoub

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1916No. 9,051PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From DeKalb Circuit Court; Frank _M. Powers, J udge. Action by Peter Shoub against Wells R. Martin. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtIbach, J.

This was an action for damages sustained by reason of fraudulent representations of appellant which induced appellee to purchase a stallion from him. A verdict in favor of appellee for $900 was returned. The errors assigned mostly turn upon the one question whether there was sufficient evidence upon which to predicate a verdict of fraud. This question is presented in various ways, under assignment of error in overruling appellant’s motion for new trial, among the grounds of which were the overruling of a motion to direct a verdict for defendant, the giving of certain instructions based on the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wheatcraft v. MyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. House v. FortIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
  3. Smith v. BordenIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Rose v. HurleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Bowman v. ClemmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. KochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Clarke Auto Co. v. ReynoldsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. J. I. Case Co. v. BirdIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Digitech Computer, Inc. v. Trans-Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  5. General Electric Co. v. DORRIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API