Legal Opinion

Majestic Theatre Co. v. United Artists Corporation

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided October 9, 1930No. 3259PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURROWS, District Judge.

This is an action at law, alleging a conspiracy in violation of the anti-trust laws resulting in injury to the plaintiff. The defendants, in addition to filing answers 'admitting or denying particular allegations of the complaint, pleaded a special defense, identical in form as to each of the defendants, by way of confession and avoidance. To this defense plaintiff demurred, and the matter is before the court on this demurrer.

One of the principal claims made by the defendants, both in argument and brief, is that the complaint does not set out a good cause of action,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Eastern States Retail Lumber Dealers' Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Paramount Publix CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  2. Fox Film Corp. v. C. & M. Amusement Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API