Legal Opinion

Fox Film Corp. v. C. & M. Amusement Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 28, 1932No. 2926Published

1Opinion of the Court

HOUGH, District Judge.

The plaintiff sues the defendant for breach of two written contracts, known in the film trade as “standard exhibition contracts.” The contracts were in process of perform*338anee, the film company furnishing the films periodically under the terms of the contracts, and the amusement company or exhibitor receiving the films, exhibiting the same in its theaters, and paying the contract price therefor.

The standard exhibition contract such as is involved in this action was tested for its legality in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, where it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. A. B. Small Co. v. Lamborn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Paramount Famous Lasky Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Paramount Famous Lasky Corp. v. National Theatre Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API