Legal Opinion

McKee Electric Co. v. Rauland-Borg Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1967PublishedCited by 243 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScilippi, J.

Rauland-Borg Corporation, the only defendant involved on this appeal, is a manufacturer of sonic equipment in Illinois, and is not qualified to do business in New York, has no place of business here, no officers, agents or employees, no property either real or personal, and no telephone listing. Its products are sold in New York State by a number of distributors, all of whom are independent businessmen selling the sound equipment of other manufacturers as well as that of RaulandBorg. Less than 5% of Rauland-Borg’s total sales are made to its distributors in New York and, when distributors…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

3Cited by243 opinions

  1. Credit Lyonnais Securities (Usa), Inc. v. Rafael Alcantara and Cavelba, S.A., Doing Business as Casa De Bolsa Rafael Alcantara V.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  2. Cutco Industries, Inc. v. Dennis E. NaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  3. Best Van Lines, Inc. v. Tim Walker, Docket No. 04-3924-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. Hoffritz for Cutlery, Inc. And Edwin Jay, Inc. v. Amajac, Ltd. And Jack E. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. McGowan v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

238 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API