Legal Opinion

Bolton v. Gramlich

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 28, 1982No. 81 CIV 2806 (LBS), 80 CIV 7410 (LBS)PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAND, District Judge.

In the two actions now before the Court on motions to dismiss, the plaintiffs are disappointed tender offerors who strain to find protection in federal law. The defendants, who perceive the plaintiffs’ pleading as an invalid attempt to invoke a federal forum, allege that the plaintiffs have impermissibly grafted federal claims onto what are essentially state law claims for breach of fiduciary duty. The transactions giving rise to this litigation are complex but may be somewhat simplified for the purposes of this motion to dismiss in which the plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Royal Business Group, Inc. v. Realist, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  2. Sanders v. Thrall Car Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  3. D'ADDARIO v. GellerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
  4. Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co. (U.S.A.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  5. Terrydale Liquidating Trust v. BarnessDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API