Legal Opinion
Dogan v. Harbert Construction Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 15, 1980No. 80 Civ. 0005 (KTD)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY, District Judge:
Plaintiffs, Dr. Ulvi A. Dogan [hereinafter “Dogan”] and Sado & Dogan, Inc. [hereinafter “SADO”] seek damages for the alleged breach of two exclusive agency agreements entered into with the defendant, Harbert Construction Corporation [hereinafter referred to as “Harbert”]. The defendant has moved pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) and (5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for an order quashing service of process and dismissing the complaint on the grounds that this court lacks personal jurisdiction over the defendant and that the process purportedly…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Frummer v. Hilton Hotels International, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Mayer v. Josiah Wedgwood & Sons, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Rolls-Royce Motors, Inc. v. Charles Schmitt & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Bower v. WeismanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- DirecTV Latin America, LLC v. PARK 610, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Bialek v. Racal-Milgo, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.