Legal Opinion

Busse v. United Panam Financial Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 8, 2014No. G046805PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEDSWORTH, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Occasionally we are faced with a difficult question of statutory interpretation that qualifies as a “Halbert’s Lumber issue.” (E.g., Halbert’s Lumber, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc. (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th 1233, 1235 [8 Cal.Rptr.2d 298] (Halbert’s Lumber) [“a real doozy of a puzzle”].) This is such a case, involving section 1312 of the Corporations Code, which generally governs the rights of minority shareholders who dissent from mergers and buyouts. No published case has confronted the problem of how subdivision (b) of section 1312—which involves buyouts when…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Clean Air Constituency v. California State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hirst v. City of OceansideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Modacure v. B&B Vehicle Processing, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Reilly v. Marin Hous. Auth., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. County of Los Angeles v. Employee Relations Commission CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Li v. Arcsoft, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API