Legal Opinion

Reilly v. Marin Hous. Auth.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided April 25, 2018No. A149918PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Tucher, J.*

*428Kerrie Reilly lives with her severely disabled adult daughter in housing subsidized by the Marin Housing Authority (MHA). The family participates in the Housing Choice Voucher program, commonly known as Section 8, which MHA administers according to the rules and regulations of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). As a Section 8 participant, Kerrie Reilly receives a monthly rent subsidy, or "housing assistance payment," the size of which varies depending on her income.

The Reillys also participate in a state social services program designed to help…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  4. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Mt. Hawley Insurance v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reilly v. Marin Housing AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API