Legal Opinion
Sacramento Grazing Ass'n v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 1, 2010No. 04-786LPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PENDING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.
BRADEN, Judge.
The New Mexico Constitution provides that “[bjenefieial use shall be the basis, the measure^] and the limit of the right to the use of water.” New Mexioo Constitution, art. XVI, § 3. The Takings Clause of the United States Constitution guarantees that “private property [shall not] be taken for public use without just compensation.” United States Constitution amend. V.
The core issue in this ease is whether the United States Forest Service (“USFS”) has affected a taking of the beneficial use of certain…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Placer Mining Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Robert A. Luciano, Jr., Trustee of the Robert A. Luciano Jr. Revocable Trust Dated February 27, 1995 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Sacramento Grazing Association, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Sacramento Grazing Association, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021