Legal Opinion

People v. French

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 20, 1991No. 2-89-0523PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

Defendant, Louis French, appeals from an order of the circuit court of DuPage County dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. On appeal, defendant contends that: (1) the trial court erred by denying him an evidentiary hearing on various constitutional claims allegedly raised in the petition; (2) the court should have appointed an attorney outside the public defender’s office to represent him; and (3) reversal is required because of his attorney’s failure to comply with Supreme Court Rule 651(c) (134 Ill. 2d R. 651(c)) by making necessary amendments to his pro se petition. We affirm.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. SpreitzerIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. BarnardIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. People v. FreeIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. Del VecchioIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. People v. StewartIllinois Supreme Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Edward Spreitzer v. Howard A. Peters, Iii, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections and Richard B. Gramley, Warden, Pontiac Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  2. People v. DeanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. People v. GullyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. People v. TomaselloAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. People v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API