People v. Jackson
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Appleton
Defendant, Nathaniel Jackson, appeals from the summary dismissal of his pro se petition for postconviction relief. He makes two arguments: (1) we should dismiss the office of the State Appellate Defender (OSAD) and allow defendant to represent himself in this appeal, and (2) the trial court erred in summarily dismissing his petition, which stated the gist of a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We deny defendant’s request to represent himself, and we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
The State charged defendant with burglary (720 ILCS 5/19 — 1 (West 2002)). Because…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- People v. BlairIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. HimberAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
- People v. GrayerIllinois Supreme Court · 2023
- People v. GrayerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2022
- People v. HollowayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008