Legal Opinion
Wismo Company v. Martin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 5, 1932No. 28,876PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action to recover upon a judgment of the municipal court of Chicago entered upon a warrant of attorney to confess judgment upon a promissory note. The plaintiff interposed three demurrers to three separate portions of the answer. They were overruled with leave to reply. The plaintiff replied, and the .case went to trial. There was a verdict for the defendant. From the judgment the plaintiff appeals.
On March 6, 1930, judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant in the municipal court of Chicago on a warrant of attorney to confess judgment in the sum of $248.34. The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Albrecht v. RathaiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Disbrow v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- C. W. Raymond Co. v. KahnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Delasca v. GrimesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Stevens v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- M & M Securities Co. v. DirnbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Weiland v. Northwestern Distilleries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Smith v. BergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932