Legal Opinion
In re Eastman Kodak Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 16, 1931No. 4551PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
This is a motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of prohibition or mandamus to restrain the District Court from exercising jurisdiction over the petitioner whieh it assumed on service of a writ of summons and continues to hold after dismissing a rule to set aside the service. The petitioner finds authority for its motion in section 377 of title 28 of the United States Code Annotated, whieh provides that, “ the circuit courts of appeals * ‘4 5 ” shall have power to issue all writs not specifically provided for by statute, which may be necessary for the” exercise…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Ex Parte State of New York, No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Smith v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Welsh, JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Thompson Products, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- Hazeltine Corp. v. KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Ward Baking Co. v. HoltzoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- United States ex rel. McNeill v. AvisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.