Legal Opinion
Ward Baking Co. v. Holtzoff
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 3, 1947No. Docket Nos. 20696-20708, 20720, 20745, 20746PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
There are before us sixteen similar but separate petitions for prohibition and mandamus, to which the respondent has filed a single return by leave of court. Each petition prays that this court issue a writ of prohibition to prevent Judge Holtzoff and the other district judges in the southern district of New York from any further exercise of jurisdiction in an action brought against the petitioner, and issue a writ of mandamus requiring the respondent to vacate an order made by him overruling a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction over the subject…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ex Parte FaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- KVOS, Inc. v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Battaglia v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Clayton v. WarlickCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Welsh, JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- In Re Zyprexa Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Holland v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1947
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.