Legal Opinion
State v. Gilbert
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 6, 1999No. AC 16536PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HEALEY, J.
The sole issue1 of this appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence2 to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty of possession *533of a narcotic substance, i.e., cocaine, with the intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-278 (b).3 We find the evidence sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction, and we affirm the judgment.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. On December 6, 1995, at about 8:30 p.m., Trooper Robert Bardelli of the Connecticut state police and Officer Sean Dautrich of the New London police department…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. SivriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. SiminoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. JeffersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. DavisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. SpillaneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- State v. WattsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. ClarkConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.