Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 14, 1999No. AC 17518PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FOTI, J.

The defendant, Herbert Clark, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of possession of narcotics with intent to sell by aperson who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b),1 possession of narcotics with intent *110to sell within 1500 feet of a public housing project and an elementary school in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b), and possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a).* 2 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the evidence presented by the state was insufficient to sustain his…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. ChicanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. State v. AlfonsoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. State v. TillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. State v. MaderaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ParisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. State v. Ellis T.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. State v. NanowskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. State v. ThomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. State v. HammondConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API