State v. Clark
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendant, Herbert Clark, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of possession of narcotics with intent to sell by aperson who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b),1 possession of narcotics with intent *110to sell within 1500 feet of a public housing project and an elementary school in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b), and possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a).* 2 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the evidence presented by the state was insufficient to sustain his…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. ChicanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. AlfonsoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. TillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. MaderaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ParisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. Ellis T.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. NanowskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- State v. ThomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- State v. HammondConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000