Legal Opinion
Haywood v. Massachusetts Automotive Group Ltd.
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided May 1, 1998PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtin, J.
This is a G.L.c. 93A action to recover for the defendant’s unfair and deceptive acts in breaching its G.L.c. 90, §7Nl/4 warranty on a used motor vehicle sold to the plaintiff. After trial, the court awarded treble damages and entered judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant has appealed pursuant to Dist/Mun. Cts. RA.D.A, Rule 8C.
As the sole basis of the defendant’s appeal is the denial of its Mass. R. Civ. R, Rule 41(b) (2) motion for involuntary dismissal,1 we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Devito v. Cellular Mobile Commun., Inc., 1993 Mass. App. Div. 48,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Spring v. Geriatric Authority of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Service Publications, Inc. v. GovermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- York v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Fidelity Management & Research Co. v. OstranderMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lindquist v. Garrett Auctioneers, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
- Hale v. Building 19⅙Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
- Benzaquin v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003
- Edwards v. Sullivan & Cogliano Companies, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
- Reichenbach v. Financial Freedom Centers, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.