York v. Sullivan
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtBraucher, J.
Once again we are called on to rule on the procedure to be followed under G. L. c. 93A, § 9. Cf. Commonwealth v. DeCotis, 366 Mass. 234 (1974); Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc., 366 Mass. 688 (1975); Entrialgo v. Twin City Dodge, Inc., 368 Mass. 812 (1975); Baldassari v. Public Fin. Trust, ante, 33 (1975); see Rice, New Private Remedies for Consumers: The Amendment of Chapter 93A, 54 Mass. L.Q. 307 (1969). We hold that (1) the “written demand for relief” sent to the defendants by the consumer plaintiffs complied with the statute, (2) the plaintiffs did not waive their statutory rights by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Commonwealth v. DeCotisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Karl W. Hahn v. Joseph GottliebCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Entrialgo v. Twin City Dodge, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Rodi v. Southern New England School of LawCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Purity Supreme, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.