Reichenbach v. Financial Freedom Centers, Inc.
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, P.J.
Having secured a default judgment in Ohio in a consumer-protection action against a Massachusetts defendant, plaintiff Gregory S. Reichenbach (“Reichenbach”) proceeded to have that Ohio judgment recognized and enforced in the Orleans District Court. He then moved for attorney’s fees against the defaulted defendant, Financial Freedom Centers, Inc. (“FFC”), on the ground that FFC’s failure to pay the judgment against it violated G.L.c. 93A, warranting the award of such fees. The motion judge denied the request for attorney’s fees, and Reichenbach appealed that denial. We dismiss the appeal.
In…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Spring v. Geriatric Authority of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Twin Fires Investment, LLC v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Productora E Importadora De Papel v. FlemingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Wright MacHine Corp. v. Seaman-Andwall Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Bagley v. MoxleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Floyd v. OwensMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009
- McDowell v. von ThadenMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006