Legal Opinion

Waddell George's Creek Coal Co. v. Chisholm

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 23, 1932No. [No. 50, April Term, 1932.]PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

The case is one under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Code, art. 101, as amended, and the principal questions raised for consideration on review here are two, one, of the propriety of receiving and considering in the circuit court on appeal hearsay evidence given before the State Industrial Accident Commission on the cause of injury, and the other, of the legal sufficiency of the evidence, with or without the hearsay, to' show that there had been an accident causing the injury, arising out of and in the course of the employment and ultimately causing death. The commission disallowed the claim…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Queen v. HepburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  2. Victory Sparkler & Specialty Co. v. FrancksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  3. Slacum v. JolleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  4. Cambridge Manufacturing Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  5. Thomas v. Pennsylvania RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Harris v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. ZapfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  3. Adams v. Board of Trustees of Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  4. Neuman v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. Board of Education v. SpradlinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API