Legal Opinion
Gores v. Rosenthal
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 28, 1963PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.
The plaintiff, an architect, entered into a written contract with the defendant, a property owner, on October 23, 1952, under which he contracted to render architectural services in the design and construction of a substantial residence, with certain appurtenances, for the defendant. For these services the defendant agreed to pay the plaintiff, in percentages at certain stages of the work, a basic fee of $7000, and in addition to reimburse him for the specific services of consultants. Paragraph thirteen of the contract provided: “Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters of America v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Batter Building Materials Co. v. KirschnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- American Almond Products Co. v. Consolidated Pecan Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- In re Curtis & Castle ArbitrationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Gores v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Frager v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Gary Excavating, Inc. v. Town of North HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Board of Trustees v. Federation of Technical College TeachersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Scinto v. SosinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.