Legal Opinion
Wheatland Tube Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided November 26, 2014No. Consol. 12-00298PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GORDON, Judge:
This action involves a U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) final determination in a proceeding conducted under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (“Section 129”) and covering the simultaneously-imposed antidumping and countervailing duty orders on circular welded carbon quality steel pipe (“CWP”) from the People’s Republic of China. See New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires; Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe; Laminated Woven Sacks; and Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from the People’s Republic of China, 77 Fed. Reg. 52,683 (Dep’t…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vicentin S.A.I.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Diamond Sawblades Mfrs.' Coal. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Vicentin S.A.I.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022