Legal Opinion

Willis v. . Anderson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 29, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOoNNOR, J.

The only assignment of error made by the plaintiffs on this appeal is based upon the exception to the judgment of nonsuit.

There was no personal service of summons on the nonresident defendants or on either of them; neither of said defendants entered appearance or filed answer; plaintiffs contend that the court acquired jurisdiction by attachment of property owned by said nonresident defendants in this State, and by publication of summons. Defendant, the Marine Bank, denies that the nonresident defendants have any right, title or interest in or to the lot of land levied upon by the sheriff,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stevens v. TurlingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Walton v. . WaltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Tally v. . Reid and SossamerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  4. Mayo v. StatonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Robinson v. . DaughtrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chinnis v. . CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Dunn v. DunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Garrison v. BlakeneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Vaught v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Berry v. . EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API