Legal Opinion

Despain v. Despain

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1981No. 17034PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Chief Justice:

Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion to modify a provision in a decree of divorce. Defendant had entered into a stipulation and property settlement agreement with plaintiff, which was approved and incorporated in the decree by the trial court in November 1976. By the terms of this provision defendant agreed to continue to pay support to plaintiff for two of their children so long as they resided with plaintiff and were fulltime students. Defendant’s sole ground for seeking modification was an alleged change of law, which assert-edly constituted a change of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. English v. EnglishUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Dehm v. DehmUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Kerr v. KerrUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Fletcher v. FletcherUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Land v. LandUtah Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reese v. ReeseUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Despain v. DespainUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Solomon v. FindleyArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Balls v. HackleyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API