Legal Opinion

Dehm v. Dehm

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1976No. 13964PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Plaintiff filed a motion to reduce or eliminate alimony on the ground there had been a substantial change of circumstances in the earning capability of defendant since the entry of a decree of divorce in June, 1967. Defendant filed an answer and counter-motion seeking an increase in alimony and child support and a modification of the provisions of the decree providing for child support and insurance coverage during the minority of the children.

The trial court made orders continuing child support, alimony, insurance, and dental expense provisions of the original decree. We…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. O'Hair v. O'HairArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Thiessen v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Borchert v. BorchertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  4. Levy v. LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. McCarthy v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Koltay v. KoltaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  2. Gribble v. GribbleUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Kamp v. KampWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Meyers v. MeyersNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Englert v. EnglertUtah Supreme Court · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API