Solomon v. Findley
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CAMERON, Justice.
I. JURISDICTION
Defendant, Lloyd Talbott Findley (Find-ley), petitioned for review of the court of appeals’ opinion allowing plaintiffs, Wilma Cornell Solomon and Adrienne Michelle Findley (Solomon), to pursue their claim for post-majority educational support in contract, rather than by enforcement of the dissolution decree. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz.Const. art. 6, § 5(3), A.R.S. § 12-120.24, and rule 23, Ariz.R.Civ. App.P., 17A A.R.S.
II. ISSUE
Do the post-minority support provisions of a contract between divorcing parents merge into the decree of dissolution…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Jameson v. JamesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Genda v. Superior Court, County of PimaArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Cutshaw v. CutshawSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979
- Bliwas v. BliwasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- McClain v. McClainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pursley v. PursleyKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Marriage of LaPrade v. LaPradeArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- Jensen v. BeirneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016