Legal Opinion

Solomon v. Findley

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1991No. CV-90-0177-PRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAMERON, Justice.

I. JURISDICTION

Defendant, Lloyd Talbott Findley (Find-ley), petitioned for review of the court of appeals’ opinion allowing plaintiffs, Wilma Cornell Solomon and Adrienne Michelle Findley (Solomon), to pursue their claim for post-majority educational support in contract, rather than by enforcement of the dissolution decree. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz.Const. art. 6, § 5(3), A.R.S. § 12-120.24, and rule 23, Ariz.R.Civ. App.P., 17A A.R.S.

II. ISSUE

Do the post-minority support provisions of a contract between divorcing parents merge into the decree of dissolution…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Jameson v. JamesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Genda v. Superior Court, County of PimaArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Cutshaw v. CutshawSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979
  4. Bliwas v. BliwasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. McClain v. McClainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pursley v. PursleyKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Marriage of LaPrade v. LaPradeArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Jensen v. BeirneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API