Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Bureau of Engraving

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 31, 1990No. C0-90-1084PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Justice.

Certiorari to review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals affirming a compensation judge’s denial of benefits but reversing, by majority decision, an award of attorney fees.

The relator challenges the finding that she failed to give the employer timely notice of her injury within the statutory period. No purpose would be served in restating the facts involved in this appeal. It is sufficient, that upon a careful review of the proceedings herein, it is the opinion of this court that the finding pertaining to statutory notice is not manifestly contrary to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Ruether v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Edquist v. Browning-FerrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ellen Gianotti v. Independent School District 152 and RAM Mutual Insurance Co., Relators, and Sanford Health, Essentia Health Systems, Injured Workers Pharmacy, and Onword Therapy, Intervenors.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Knowlen v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API