Legal Opinion
In re Puda Coal Securities Inc. Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 14, 2014No. 11-cv-2598 (KBF)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge:
The second consolidated amended complaint in this matter (“Compl.,” ECF No. 352) asserts claims, inter alia, against Bre-an Murray, Carret & Co. (“Brean Murray”) and Macquarie Capital (USA) Inc. (“Macquarie”) (collectively, the “underwriters”), the underwriters of a public stock offering by Puda Coal Ine. (“Puda”), under Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.
Now before the Court are the underwriters’ motions to dismiss the complaint on…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sharette v. Credit Suisse InternationalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- In re Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Norstra Energy Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- In re Stemline Therapeutics, Inc. Sec. Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Deluca v. GPB Automotive Portfolio, LPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.