Legal Opinion
United States v. William Boyd, James D'metri, Michael J. Lipton, Stephen Powell, George Parr
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 3, 1978No. 77-1622, 77-1623, 77-1624, 77-1625 and 77-1656PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.
In this case appellants raise several grounds for reversal of their convictions of conspiracy and substantive offenses relating to the manufacture and distribution of methamphetamine in the Philadelphia area during 1975. Although we have reviewed all of the contentions raised by appellants,1 we shall discuss only two issues: 1) whether a prejudicial variance existed between the conspiracy count of the indictment and the proof adduced at trial; and 2) whether the trial judge erred in allowing the jury to consider evidence of illegal acts occurring…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. VarelliCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- United States v. DanskerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States v. KennyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- United States v. Linette Perez, United States of America v. Juancho Alcantera, United States of America v. Edmundo BatoonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. DeLunaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. RiccobeneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- United States v. AmmarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Ronald Glen ShawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.