Legal Opinion

Siepka v. Bogulski

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.

On a suit involving $121 and interest thereon, the defendant made a motion before the City Court of Buffalo for a dismissal of seventy-five dollars of the amount claimed in the action on the ground that the cause of action as to such seventy-five dollars did not accrue within the time limited by law for the commencement of an action thereon. Although it is true that such objection could be raised by motion (Civ. Prac. Act, § 30), the same question could have been raised by answer, and thus disposition of the entire issues in the action could have been made at the trial without the expense of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Young v. . HillNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Jasper Trust Co. v. LamkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Crane v. StansburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Slayback v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Griffin Wellpoint Corporation v. Munro-Langstroth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
  2. Frucht v. GarciaNassau County District Court · 1964
  3. Department of Housing Preservation & Development v. 849 St. Nicholas EquitiesCivil Court of the City of New York · 1988
  4. Gerken v. Estate of BertramNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Justs v. KalninsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API