Legal Opinion

Gerken v. Estate of Bertram

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall E. Livingston, J.

Plaintiff sues on an alleged account stated for the balance due on a bond and mortgage, plus money advanced for fire insurance premiums.

Mortgagors, husband and wife, are deceased, and the action is defended by their son, who is the administrator c. t. a. of their respective estates. The answer is a general denial, coupled with a counterclaim based on alleged fraud.

Plaintiff now moves for summary judgment. There is no cross motion. However, CPLR 3212 (subd. [b]) permits the court to grant such summary judgment as may be proper without the necessity of a cross motion.

Chief Judge Andrews’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Young v. . HillNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Schutz v. . MoretteNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Siepka v. BogulskiNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Chicago Crayon Co. v. SlatteryNew York Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. State Insurance Fund v. Great Plains Care Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API