Ivers & Pond Piano Co. v. Peckham
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The trial court found that Robert H. Hoyman, agent for the piano company, knew that the $2,000 paid on May 12, 1961, originating with the defendant, Ellsworth L. Peckham, was for the purpose of satisfying the guaranty contract and, therefore, held that the defendant discharged his guaranty by payment. We deem that the court applied the correct rule of law. Where a creditor accepts payment from a third person knowing it came from the guarantor, the payment must be applied in satisfaction of the guaranty.
“. . . if the creditor is aware of the source of the payment, he should apply it to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Estate of BealeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Hansche v. A. J. Conroy, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Bie v. IngersollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Kirchen v. GottschalkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Johnson v. Associated Seed Growers, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- L.L.N. v. ClauderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Selzer v. Brunsell Brothers, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- Warrior Constructors, Inc. v. Small Business Investment Co. of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Select Creations, Inc. v. Paliafito America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993
- Iowa National Mutual Insurance v. BackensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.