Legal Opinion
Selzer v. Brunsell Brothers, Ltd.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided August 29, 2002No. 01-2625PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeininger, J.
¶ 1. Peter Selzer appeals a judgment dismissing his claims against Marvin Lumber & Cedar Company for damages related to the decay of windows Selzer purchased from Marvin for use in his home. Selzer claims Marvin breached an express warranty it made when selling him the windows, as well as an implied warranty arising from the sale transaction. He also claims that a statement in Marvin's product catalog ("all exterior wood is deep-treated to permanently protect against rot and decay") constituted fraudulent advertising under Wis. Stat. § 100.18 (1999-2000), 2 and that the statement renders…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hansen v. AH Robins, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Calloway v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Daanen & Janssen, Inc. v. Cedarapids, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Gunkel v. Renovations, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Kelleher v. Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Cerabio LLC and Phillips Plastics Corporation v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Industrial Risk Insurers & Quad Graphics, Inc. v. American Engineering Testing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.