Bie v. Ingersoll

The only question raised on this appeal is whether the trial court’s findings, that the asphalt-plant’s operation and the trucking in connection with it constituted a nuisance, is contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence. Colson v. Salzman (1956), 272 Wis. 397, 401, 75 N. W. (2d) 421. The activity complained of must create more than an inconvenience, 1 and must be offensive to the person of ordinary and normal sensibilities. 2 The result is not to be measured by its effect upon those of extreme sensibilities. 3

The following finding by the trial court is in accord…