Legal Opinion

Shannon v. Introne

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1981PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. The Legislature clearly and unambiguously limited the application of section 41.34 of the Mental Hygiene Law to community residential facilities for “four to fourteen mentally disabled persons.” Inasmuch as the facility proposed in this case will contain only three persons, it does not fall within the scope of section 41.34. We have examined petitioners’ other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Spitz v. AbramsNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Spitz v. AbramsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Galligan v. City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Frontier Insurance v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1989
  5. Gordon v. BursteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API