Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Burstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 27, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Casey, J.
In the summer of 1982, respondent Department of Labor (DOL), as an economy measure, abolished some of the positions under the title of senior employment interviewer. As a result, both petitioner and respondent Edward Putzer were laid off while serving in that title in Suffolk County. By reason of his seniority, Putzer was offered and accepted a similar position in the DOL office in Westchester County. Due to the lack of a suitable available placement, petitioner was suspended and her name was placed on a preferred list in accordance with Civil Service Law § 81.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nicholas v. KahnNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- MATTER OF ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ALBANY v. New York State Dep't of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Village of Herkimer v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Adelman v. BahouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Shannon v. IntroneNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lavelle v. QuinonesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- Miller v. State of New York Department of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Kiamesha Concord, Inc. v. ChairmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- McMorran v. New York State Office of Mental HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998