Legal Opinion
Frontier Insurance v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided December 19, 1989No. Claim No. 78288PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edwin Margolis, J.
Claimant insurance company, as subrogee, commenced this action for legal fees and expenses incurred in defending its insured, Dr. Marieta G. Angtuaco, in an action for medical malpractice. Claimant avers that the State was obligated under Public Officers Law § 17 to defend Dr. Angtuaco and that it wrongfully refused and failed to do so. Claimant’s motion to file a late claim was granted by this court in a memorandum-opinion and order filed February 1, 1989.
In that memorandum-opinion, the court set forth the basic facts of this case as follows:
"The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ruder & Finn Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- A. Meyers & Sons Corp. v. Zurich American Insurance GroupNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Gerseta Corporation v. Equitable Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- New York Board of Fire Underwriters v. Trans Urban Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- New York Board of Fire Underwriters v. Trans Urban Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Frontier Insurance v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Frontier Insurance v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1993
- Champagnie v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Burrows v. Barkan Construction Co.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1995
- Gilbert v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2000